- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) BethNaught ( talk) 12:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Arun Honnedevasthana Shamrao
- Arun Honnedevasthana Shamrao ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Claim of significance may be shown (via the one article referenced), but the other reference is a Wordpress - this persons notability has not been shown, this article should be deleted. Garchy ( talk) 21:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, at least for now. The article has been repeatedly slammed with tags, beginning only seconds after its creator began writing it. It's a reasonable, good-faith effort and there is no reason not to allow its creator a reasonable opportunity to work on it. When, as here, an author's work is covered in a major national newspaper, there's a strong case for inferring notability, and WP:BEFORE calls for an attempt to assess the subject's actual notability, rather than deferring to the overhasty tag-bombing of the first patroller to come across the page and drive off the article creator. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 21:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This profile [1] in The Hindu is persuasive. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 12:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note that India media require specialized searches, i.e. bing and google don't do a good job with Indian news coverage. I did find RS coverage of his 2004 book already being recommended in U.S yoga advice articles. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 12:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) BethNaught ( talk) 12:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Arun Honnedevasthana Shamrao
- Arun Honnedevasthana Shamrao ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Claim of significance may be shown (via the one article referenced), but the other reference is a Wordpress - this persons notability has not been shown, this article should be deleted. Garchy ( talk) 21:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, at least for now. The article has been repeatedly slammed with tags, beginning only seconds after its creator began writing it. It's a reasonable, good-faith effort and there is no reason not to allow its creator a reasonable opportunity to work on it. When, as here, an author's work is covered in a major national newspaper, there's a strong case for inferring notability, and WP:BEFORE calls for an attempt to assess the subject's actual notability, rather than deferring to the overhasty tag-bombing of the first patroller to come across the page and drive off the article creator. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 21:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This profile [1] in The Hindu is persuasive. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 12:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note that India media require specialized searches, i.e. bing and google don't do a good job with Indian news coverage. I did find RS coverage of his 2004 book already being recommended in U.S yoga advice articles. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 12:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.