The result of the debate was keep. bainer ( talk) 03:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Closer's notes
As there was no clear consensus about
Deric Williams, which was added into the nomination later on a different basis than the primary nomination, I have listed that page for deletion separately, at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deric Williams.
As to the primary nomination, although a numerical majority of editors were in favour of deletion, the argument put foward was that the article did not satisfy the criteria at
WP:MUSIC. Other editors rebutted that argument, by citing sources showing the article did indeed satisfy the criteria. As such, there is no basis for deletion. This is a deletion debate, not a vote.
Delete Non-notable band Fnarf999 02:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating Deric Williams, member of this band, as being also non-notable by the standards of WP:BIO Fnarf999 02:04, 10 March 2006 (UTC) reply
-- badlydrawnjeff ( WP:MEME?) 00:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep. bainer ( talk) 03:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Closer's notes
As there was no clear consensus about
Deric Williams, which was added into the nomination later on a different basis than the primary nomination, I have listed that page for deletion separately, at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deric Williams.
As to the primary nomination, although a numerical majority of editors were in favour of deletion, the argument put foward was that the article did not satisfy the criteria at
WP:MUSIC. Other editors rebutted that argument, by citing sources showing the article did indeed satisfy the criteria. As such, there is no basis for deletion. This is a deletion debate, not a vote.
Delete Non-notable band Fnarf999 02:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating Deric Williams, member of this band, as being also non-notable by the standards of WP:BIO Fnarf999 02:04, 10 March 2006 (UTC) reply
-- badlydrawnjeff ( WP:MEME?) 00:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC) reply