- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Armature Controlled DC Motor
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Armature Controlled DC Motor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An 'Armature Controlled DC Motor' is basically just a
DC motor. I don't see the point of this article existing. Merge. The page just talks about DC motors. Stuff that should be in the DC motor article.
Sungodtemple (
talk) 19:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 19:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Good grief. A 'jet aircraft' is basically just an aircraft so I might not see the point of the Jet aircraft article existing. Does any aspect of policy or guidance underlie this nomination? Thincat ( talk) 21:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like a well written and referenced article, I am not seeing anything in the nomination that says the article fails an criteria for existing. Jeepday ( talk) 18:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, On deletion: this is a distinct type of DC motor not detailed in the DC Motor article. On merging: the transfer function is more digestable as it stands within this article. The wound stator section of the DC Motor article could be revised to include a summary of this type of motor, and a link to this article. SailingInABathTub ( talk) 03:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Armature Controlled DC Motor
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Armature Controlled DC Motor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An 'Armature Controlled DC Motor' is basically just a
DC motor. I don't see the point of this article existing. Merge. The page just talks about DC motors. Stuff that should be in the DC motor article.
Sungodtemple (
talk) 19:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 19:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Good grief. A 'jet aircraft' is basically just an aircraft so I might not see the point of the Jet aircraft article existing. Does any aspect of policy or guidance underlie this nomination? Thincat ( talk) 21:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like a well written and referenced article, I am not seeing anything in the nomination that says the article fails an criteria for existing. Jeepday ( talk) 18:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, On deletion: this is a distinct type of DC motor not detailed in the DC Motor article. On merging: the transfer function is more digestable as it stands within this article. The wound stator section of the DC Motor article could be revised to include a summary of this type of motor, and a link to this article. SailingInABathTub ( talk) 03:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.