The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.--
Jersey Devil 04:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete: Appears to be quite non-notable per
WP:BIO. This was already deleted once at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armando Gutierrez Jr (without the punctuation) but that was over a year ago and it's been recreated more than once. Maybe consensus has changed on this... —
Wknight94 (
talk) 23:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete Clearly fails
WP:BIO. Comment about the development company makes it a borderline candidate for {{db-spam}} also.--
Anthony.bradbury 23:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable member of a non-notable (redlink) organization. Argyriou(talk) 00:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. Agree with Agryriou's rationale.
MastCell 21:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. This seems to me to border on
WP:VSCA. He may be notable in the future, but does not currently seem so.
Vassyana 10:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.--
Jersey Devil 04:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete: Appears to be quite non-notable per
WP:BIO. This was already deleted once at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armando Gutierrez Jr (without the punctuation) but that was over a year ago and it's been recreated more than once. Maybe consensus has changed on this... —
Wknight94 (
talk) 23:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete Clearly fails
WP:BIO. Comment about the development company makes it a borderline candidate for {{db-spam}} also.--
Anthony.bradbury 23:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable member of a non-notable (redlink) organization. Argyriou(talk) 00:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. Agree with Agryriou's rationale.
MastCell 21:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. This seems to me to border on
WP:VSCA. He may be notable in the future, but does not currently seem so.
Vassyana 10:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.