From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Are Blytt

Are Blytt (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a re-creation of a draft that has been deleted as promotional several times, almost immediately after their block expired. G4 doesn't apply, it is no longer a copyvio. The artist is not totally non-notable, but rather still an emerging artist. There are some sources, but it seems insufficient. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] Vexations ( talk) 17:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 17:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 17:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 19:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete There isn't really any independent critical coverage out there. (Maybe also salt too, seeing as the creator recreted this after it was speedied, and was also blocked for removing speedy tags twice.) WP:TOOSOON. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 19:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Article has been rewritten to follow the guidelines, and updated Rouge DM ( talk) 19:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
    Rouge DM, I think it is possible that you have good intentions and just had a rough start here. That happens. We have more policies and guidelines than anyone can be expected to read before they start editing. It is also quite possible that you are trying to promote him and have deliberately not followed our policies and guidelines. It would be helpful if you could clarify your connection to Are Blytt (business, paid, friend/family, patron, your are him, you've never met and have never communicated with him etc..) and let us know which sources specifically establish that he meets WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST thanks, Vexations ( talk) 19:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete a non-notable painter. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Are Blytt

Are Blytt (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a re-creation of a draft that has been deleted as promotional several times, almost immediately after their block expired. G4 doesn't apply, it is no longer a copyvio. The artist is not totally non-notable, but rather still an emerging artist. There are some sources, but it seems insufficient. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] Vexations ( talk) 17:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 17:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 17:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 19:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete There isn't really any independent critical coverage out there. (Maybe also salt too, seeing as the creator recreted this after it was speedied, and was also blocked for removing speedy tags twice.) WP:TOOSOON. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 19:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Article has been rewritten to follow the guidelines, and updated Rouge DM ( talk) 19:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
    Rouge DM, I think it is possible that you have good intentions and just had a rough start here. That happens. We have more policies and guidelines than anyone can be expected to read before they start editing. It is also quite possible that you are trying to promote him and have deliberately not followed our policies and guidelines. It would be helpful if you could clarify your connection to Are Blytt (business, paid, friend/family, patron, your are him, you've never met and have never communicated with him etc..) and let us know which sources specifically establish that he meets WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST thanks, Vexations ( talk) 19:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete a non-notable painter. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook