The result was delete for now, without prejudice to recreation if this package attains wider notoriety. Mackensen (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC) reply
This article was originally PRODed an nn, but an editor left an impolite message saying that he was reposting the content, which is (I guess) one way of contesting the thing. Anyway, no reliable sources, no evidence of notability, slightly advertorial. Delete. Xoloz 19:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC) reply
EdJohnston 02:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC) reply
I had considered editing the article to add more detail (several weeks ago), but I refrained, because articles on somewhat comparable open source projects (e.g. Dovecot) didn't go into more detail; and also because it seemed likely to be considered a conflict of interest, and we have no interest in either advertising or deception.
-- 59.176.72.33 05:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC) reply
-- 59.176.72.33 10:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete for now, without prejudice to recreation if this package attains wider notoriety. Mackensen (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC) reply
This article was originally PRODed an nn, but an editor left an impolite message saying that he was reposting the content, which is (I guess) one way of contesting the thing. Anyway, no reliable sources, no evidence of notability, slightly advertorial. Delete. Xoloz 19:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC) reply
EdJohnston 02:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC) reply
I had considered editing the article to add more detail (several weeks ago), but I refrained, because articles on somewhat comparable open source projects (e.g. Dovecot) didn't go into more detail; and also because it seemed likely to be considered a conflict of interest, and we have no interest in either advertising or deception.
-- 59.176.72.33 05:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC) reply
-- 59.176.72.33 10:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC) reply