The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable. Advertisement.
BlueValour 20:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Seems to be a reasonably significant research database endeavour with good Google coverage. Per its
website, "ArchiveGrid is a service of RLG, a not-for-profit membership organization of over 150 universities, national libraries, archives, historical societies, and other institutions with remarkable collections for research and learning." Good enough for me.
Sandstein 21:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep Seems notable. Has web coverage outside of blog-spams and press-releases.
Artw 23:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Seems fine. —
199 19:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable. Advertisement.
BlueValour 20:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Seems to be a reasonably significant research database endeavour with good Google coverage. Per its
website, "ArchiveGrid is a service of RLG, a not-for-profit membership organization of over 150 universities, national libraries, archives, historical societies, and other institutions with remarkable collections for research and learning." Good enough for me.
Sandstein 21:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep Seems notable. Has web coverage outside of blog-spams and press-releases.
Artw 23:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Seems fine. —
199 19:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.