The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 14:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
No credible assertion signifying the notability of the article. No appropriate refs. Only one and that too to you tube (not allowed). Thus proposing its deletion under criteria A7. Might have nominated it for speedy deletion if it's category (television-related articles) was listed in A7. Also, the article seems to be a borderline advertisement, and is clearly written by a fan and thus is not written neutrally. Also it can be clearly seen that the article contains (in fact its based upon) original research. King Of The Wise ( talk) 03:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 14:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
No credible assertion signifying the notability of the article. No appropriate refs. Only one and that too to you tube (not allowed). Thus proposing its deletion under criteria A7. Might have nominated it for speedy deletion if it's category (television-related articles) was listed in A7. Also, the article seems to be a borderline advertisement, and is clearly written by a fan and thus is not written neutrally. Also it can be clearly seen that the article contains (in fact its based upon) original research. King Of The Wise ( talk) 03:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)