The result was keep. Notability seems established and the article can be rewritten to address concerns about its focus. Canley ( talk) 07:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Article is not notable and has had a notability warning tag since January. Stub contains a single sentence and does not provide information about the actual movement other than the very basic top layer of it. Article has no backlinks (other than a bot's log archive) and has a single source.
Article does not recite why it is notable nor why the reason for the movement was notable.
A number of users joining a Facebook group can hardly be considered a reason for notability as users joining a Facebook group don't necessarily support the group's ideals. Alpha 4615 ( talk) 23:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Notability seems established and the article can be rewritten to address concerns about its focus. Canley ( talk) 07:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Article is not notable and has had a notability warning tag since January. Stub contains a single sentence and does not provide information about the actual movement other than the very basic top layer of it. Article has no backlinks (other than a bot's log archive) and has a single source.
Article does not recite why it is notable nor why the reason for the movement was notable.
A number of users joining a Facebook group can hardly be considered a reason for notability as users joining a Facebook group don't necessarily support the group's ideals. Alpha 4615 ( talk) 23:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC) reply