- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Disruptive conduct is a problem, but no evidence has been put forward for notability, and I cannot close this any other way. Vanamonde ( Talk) 19:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aponi-vi, Arizona ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Renomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aponi-vi, Arizona. Here's the Google Maps view showing a butte: On what basis was this article created to say it "is a populated place"? The topo is labeled with "Po Ni Vi (site)" at this location, with no indication of it being a community. The National Gazetteer calls it a locale. I can't find any other results in Google Books or newspapers.com. Onel5969 Mangoe dlthewave Reywas92 Talk 16:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. Reywas92 Talk 16:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Topos show this as one of three "sites" along the ridge leading to Oraibi Butte but I can't find any coverage explaining what would have been there. Absent significant coverage or legal recognition, there's no basis for the claim that this meets GEOLAND or any of our notability standards. – dlthewave ☎ 17:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, initial nomination was with valid grounds, not a mere "bad faith harassment". ~ Pog ing Juan 16:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - the prior nom was bad faith harrasment by the editor directly above, and the editor was admonished for it. Their lack of understanding is problematic. Onel5969 TT me 19:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Disruptive conduct is a problem, but no evidence has been put forward for notability, and I cannot close this any other way. Vanamonde ( Talk) 19:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aponi-vi, Arizona ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Renomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aponi-vi, Arizona. Here's the Google Maps view showing a butte: On what basis was this article created to say it "is a populated place"? The topo is labeled with "Po Ni Vi (site)" at this location, with no indication of it being a community. The National Gazetteer calls it a locale. I can't find any other results in Google Books or newspapers.com. Onel5969 Mangoe dlthewave Reywas92 Talk 16:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. Reywas92 Talk 16:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Topos show this as one of three "sites" along the ridge leading to Oraibi Butte but I can't find any coverage explaining what would have been there. Absent significant coverage or legal recognition, there's no basis for the claim that this meets GEOLAND or any of our notability standards. – dlthewave ☎ 17:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, initial nomination was with valid grounds, not a mere "bad faith harassment". ~ Pog ing Juan 16:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - the prior nom was bad faith harrasment by the editor directly above, and the editor was admonished for it. Their lack of understanding is problematic. Onel5969 TT me 19:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.