The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 09:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Moribund journal of unclear notability. No independent sources, not indexed in any selective database. Tagged for missing references for 2.5 years with no improvement forthcoming. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 23:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
2. From WP:NJOURNALS: "This guideline is independent from the other subject-specific notability guidelines, such as WP:BIO, Wikipedia:Notability (media), etc.: It is possible for a journal not to be notable under the provisions of this guideline but still to be notable in some other way, under one of the other subject-specific notability guidelines." - So WP:NJOURNALS is a straw man here. 3. From WP:GNG: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." - The problem here is that Apeiron as a topic also necessarily refers to an organisation of people and its contributors, which includes clearly notable physicists and astronomers such as Halton Arp, the late Mendel Sachs, Jean-Claude Pecker, and Jean-Pierre Vigier (former assistant to Louis de Broglie, and who would have been Einstein's assistant but was denied entry to the U.S.). User:Randykitty, who launched this Afd, removed a long-standing reference to Jean-Pierre Vigier at 07:25, 11 February 2013 - calling the move "some cleanup" - just three minutes before first nominating the article for deletion under WP:PROD. Silent Key ( talk) 04:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 09:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Moribund journal of unclear notability. No independent sources, not indexed in any selective database. Tagged for missing references for 2.5 years with no improvement forthcoming. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 23:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
2. From WP:NJOURNALS: "This guideline is independent from the other subject-specific notability guidelines, such as WP:BIO, Wikipedia:Notability (media), etc.: It is possible for a journal not to be notable under the provisions of this guideline but still to be notable in some other way, under one of the other subject-specific notability guidelines." - So WP:NJOURNALS is a straw man here. 3. From WP:GNG: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." - The problem here is that Apeiron as a topic also necessarily refers to an organisation of people and its contributors, which includes clearly notable physicists and astronomers such as Halton Arp, the late Mendel Sachs, Jean-Claude Pecker, and Jean-Pierre Vigier (former assistant to Louis de Broglie, and who would have been Einstein's assistant but was denied entry to the U.S.). User:Randykitty, who launched this Afd, removed a long-standing reference to Jean-Pierre Vigier at 07:25, 11 February 2013 - calling the move "some cleanup" - just three minutes before first nominating the article for deletion under WP:PROD. Silent Key ( talk) 04:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC) reply