- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Anton Vogl
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anton Vogl ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Anton Vogl
There are no sources on the page and there is no information on Anton Vogl online apart from copy pasted articles from the Wikipedia article. This leads into the only other information on Vogl to be from Wikipedia clones which also do not present sources nor count as a source. Copyrightpower1337 ( talk) 02:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Austria. Shellwood ( talk) 07:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. this was deprodded, but no reason given. I haven't found any evidence of an "Anton Vogl", military officer, ever existing, and I'm giving up after having found Anton Vogl, present-day scientist, Anton Vogl, early 19th-century physician (see eg [1]), and Anton Vogl, early 19th-century historian (presumably not the same guy, but who knows - see [2]). Only the physician is indexed at DB (and no NDB article). I think it is safe to say that Anton Vogl, officer, did not, as the wikipedia article says, become "famous" for much of anything. -- asilvering ( talk) 12:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete agree with above, can't find much of anything for this fellow. Oaktree b ( talk) 12:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment -- It is always difficult to judge the quality of a stub. "Lieutenant Field Marshal" sounds like a variety of general; if so I would expect him to be notable. I would also expect there to be an article in the German WP: is there?
Peterkingiron (
talk)
18:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Feldmarschallleutnant was the equivalent of lieutenant-general in the Austro-Hungarian army. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable and likely failing WP:V. I say "likely" only because I did find brief mention of a "Lieutenant Colonel Anton Vogl [who] took up post in 1796" of an Austrian cavalry regiment. Fighting Troops of the Austro-Hungarian Army, 1868-1914 - Page 112. The stub article has him being born in 1789, however, which would have made him seven years old when he took command, so he is not likely to be the same man and I can find no source showing an Anton Vogl of higher rank. 68.189.242.116 ( talk) 15:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Anton Vogl
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anton Vogl ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Anton Vogl
There are no sources on the page and there is no information on Anton Vogl online apart from copy pasted articles from the Wikipedia article. This leads into the only other information on Vogl to be from Wikipedia clones which also do not present sources nor count as a source. Copyrightpower1337 ( talk) 02:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Austria. Shellwood ( talk) 07:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. this was deprodded, but no reason given. I haven't found any evidence of an "Anton Vogl", military officer, ever existing, and I'm giving up after having found Anton Vogl, present-day scientist, Anton Vogl, early 19th-century physician (see eg [1]), and Anton Vogl, early 19th-century historian (presumably not the same guy, but who knows - see [2]). Only the physician is indexed at DB (and no NDB article). I think it is safe to say that Anton Vogl, officer, did not, as the wikipedia article says, become "famous" for much of anything. -- asilvering ( talk) 12:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete agree with above, can't find much of anything for this fellow. Oaktree b ( talk) 12:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment -- It is always difficult to judge the quality of a stub. "Lieutenant Field Marshal" sounds like a variety of general; if so I would expect him to be notable. I would also expect there to be an article in the German WP: is there?
Peterkingiron (
talk)
18:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Feldmarschallleutnant was the equivalent of lieutenant-general in the Austro-Hungarian army. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable and likely failing WP:V. I say "likely" only because I did find brief mention of a "Lieutenant Colonel Anton Vogl [who] took up post in 1796" of an Austrian cavalry regiment. Fighting Troops of the Austro-Hungarian Army, 1868-1914 - Page 112. The stub article has him being born in 1789, however, which would have made him seven years old when he took command, so he is not likely to be the same man and I can find no source showing an Anton Vogl of higher rank. 68.189.242.116 ( talk) 15:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.