The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 22:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
At first sight, this is a well-sourced article on a new journal. However, it's unusual that a new journal would receive so much attention that it meets WP:GNG basically from before it even has published a first issue (several articles have been published now), so I had a closer look at the sources. This was revealing. A number of references are clearly not independent (journal's own website, press releases). The other sources are, at best, in-passing mentions, some do not even mention the journal (current reference #6 to The Times Diary). In sum, this does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals and at best is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 21:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 22:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
At first sight, this is a well-sourced article on a new journal. However, it's unusual that a new journal would receive so much attention that it meets WP:GNG basically from before it even has published a first issue (several articles have been published now), so I had a closer look at the sources. This was revealing. A number of references are clearly not independent (journal's own website, press releases). The other sources are, at best, in-passing mentions, some do not even mention the journal (current reference #6 to The Times Diary). In sum, this does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals and at best is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 21:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)