- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Author admits it is original research and this time he will not be allowed to change his mind. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 15:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Antientropic probability distribution ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Without sources other than the author citing himself in edit summaries, this appears to be original research. PROD was contested by the author. VQuakr ( talk) 07:24, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Author: This is not original research. It is the result of years of research in statistical mechanics done by many scientists, and my contribution is only the thought experiment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorianluparu ( talk • contribs) 07:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- We have articles based on secondary sources about entropy. This article is about your thought experiment, and is original research. VQuakr ( talk) 07:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- So should I use other sites to publish my original research? Then delete this article before sites with original research where I publish may detect it as plagiarism from Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorianluparu ( talk • contribs) 10:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note. Dorianluparu seems unable to make up his mind - first he requests deletion, then he re-creates it.
- Delete and salt. Author admits it is original research and has made no attempt to provide any references. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 14:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Author admits it is original research and this time he will not be allowed to change his mind. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 15:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Antientropic probability distribution ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Without sources other than the author citing himself in edit summaries, this appears to be original research. PROD was contested by the author. VQuakr ( talk) 07:24, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Author: This is not original research. It is the result of years of research in statistical mechanics done by many scientists, and my contribution is only the thought experiment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorianluparu ( talk • contribs) 07:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- We have articles based on secondary sources about entropy. This article is about your thought experiment, and is original research. VQuakr ( talk) 07:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- So should I use other sites to publish my original research? Then delete this article before sites with original research where I publish may detect it as plagiarism from Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorianluparu ( talk • contribs) 10:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note. Dorianluparu seems unable to make up his mind - first he requests deletion, then he re-creates it.
- Delete and salt. Author admits it is original research and has made no attempt to provide any references. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 14:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.