The result was Speedy delete as created by a blocked user in violation of the block (confirmed by checkuser), and also as promotion, as the article served only to promote a particular point of view. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a clear and obvious WP:POVFORK from Sectarianism in the 2011–2012 Syrian uprising. I suspect the user who originally created the page, User:Grimso5, may be a sock of User:ChronicalUsual, who was blocked for disruptive editing on Syria content before, and I am all but certain that the user who recreated this page after its content was moved to the "Sectarianism" page, User:FavorLaw, is a sock of ChronicalUsual. The article name is blatantly POV; all of this content is already either included in the "Sectarianism" article or it could easily be incorporated there. Both editors' purpose in creating and then recreating this page (whether they are separate individuals or not) appears to be to promote an anti-Syrian opposition POV. I am not opposed to include verifiable information no matter who it looks bad for, but this doesn't need to be a separate page, it was already moved to a less POV title, and this is a clear case of POV forking, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Kudzu1 ( talk) 23:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep 1) You are paranoid with your baseless accusations. 2) This is not a fork from the sectarianism page as the sectarianism page has been created AFTER the page you are nominating for deletion. This is a massive logic failure from your part 3) If anything it is the Sectarianism page which is the fork created by user:Sopher99 who already tried to merge , redirect and speedy delete the nominated page because he did not like the content. You are following his path -- FavorLaw ( talk) 23:42, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep - Because the Alawite minority holds power in Syria, Alawites form a special and obvious target for negative sentiment, violence and lynching by those opposed to the current government. Their special position of minority-but-governing makes them a specific case that should not be tucked away into a general article on sectarianism. - TaalVerbeteraar ( talk) 10:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Important note - User:FavorLaw has been blocked and tagged as a sockpuppet of the disruptive editor User:ChronicalUsual. - Kudzu1 ( talk) 19:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment - I forgot to mention earlier that User:Grimso5, the original author of this page, was also blocked and tagged as a User:ChronicalUsual sockpuppet. - Kudzu1 ( talk) 17:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete as created by a blocked user in violation of the block (confirmed by checkuser), and also as promotion, as the article served only to promote a particular point of view. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a clear and obvious WP:POVFORK from Sectarianism in the 2011–2012 Syrian uprising. I suspect the user who originally created the page, User:Grimso5, may be a sock of User:ChronicalUsual, who was blocked for disruptive editing on Syria content before, and I am all but certain that the user who recreated this page after its content was moved to the "Sectarianism" page, User:FavorLaw, is a sock of ChronicalUsual. The article name is blatantly POV; all of this content is already either included in the "Sectarianism" article or it could easily be incorporated there. Both editors' purpose in creating and then recreating this page (whether they are separate individuals or not) appears to be to promote an anti-Syrian opposition POV. I am not opposed to include verifiable information no matter who it looks bad for, but this doesn't need to be a separate page, it was already moved to a less POV title, and this is a clear case of POV forking, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Kudzu1 ( talk) 23:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep 1) You are paranoid with your baseless accusations. 2) This is not a fork from the sectarianism page as the sectarianism page has been created AFTER the page you are nominating for deletion. This is a massive logic failure from your part 3) If anything it is the Sectarianism page which is the fork created by user:Sopher99 who already tried to merge , redirect and speedy delete the nominated page because he did not like the content. You are following his path -- FavorLaw ( talk) 23:42, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep - Because the Alawite minority holds power in Syria, Alawites form a special and obvious target for negative sentiment, violence and lynching by those opposed to the current government. Their special position of minority-but-governing makes them a specific case that should not be tucked away into a general article on sectarianism. - TaalVerbeteraar ( talk) 10:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Important note - User:FavorLaw has been blocked and tagged as a sockpuppet of the disruptive editor User:ChronicalUsual. - Kudzu1 ( talk) 19:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment - I forgot to mention earlier that User:Grimso5, the original author of this page, was also blocked and tagged as a User:ChronicalUsual sockpuppet. - Kudzu1 ( talk) 17:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC) reply