The result was delete. Only strong keep argument is based on inherited notability. The Bushranger One ping only 00:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, could not find any sources that go into details. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Does not appear to meet WP:AUTHOR. Current article would need to be fundamentally re-written to be encyclopedic: it presents fringe views with little reference to the mainstream, contrary to WP:VALID throughout it's short content. IRWolfie- ( talk) 20:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Only strong keep argument is based on inherited notability. The Bushranger One ping only 00:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, could not find any sources that go into details. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Does not appear to meet WP:AUTHOR. Current article would need to be fundamentally re-written to be encyclopedic: it presents fringe views with little reference to the mainstream, contrary to WP:VALID throughout it's short content. IRWolfie- ( talk) 20:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC) reply