The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn.
CT Cooper ·talk 21:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep - Evidently notable, meeting
WP:GNG, for example this
recent article and a quick glance at the Google News Search. Judging by the cited claims in the existing sources in the article, it's difficult to believe Jokhadze is not a well-known personality in Georgia!
Sionk (
talk) 11:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep Performer has taken part in Eurovision before (see link
http://natfinals.50webs.com/Georgia2012.html) and is taking part in his own right. Is clearly a star in his own country even though English language sources might be found wanting. Taking part in an international competition should satisfy GNG and ARTIST.
doktorbwordsdeeds 12:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Seriously Strong Keep If such articles become deleted, then we'd might as well start deleting all articles relating to one-time participants in Eurovision, and create a black hole in a project. Many English-speaking users worldwide rely on such Eurovision-related articles for the purpose of research for whatever reasons, whether it be pub quizzes, or general enthusiasm for the Eurovision Song Contest, and everything - artist(s) and song(s). Don't start crashing down a European heritage and cause a huge research black hole.
Wesley☀Mouse 17:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Nomination Withdrawn The article looks much better than it did the other day. Now we have four sources. It still has some grammar issues, but that can be easily taken care of. -
Aaron Booth (
talk) 17:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn.
CT Cooper ·talk 21:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep - Evidently notable, meeting
WP:GNG, for example this
recent article and a quick glance at the Google News Search. Judging by the cited claims in the existing sources in the article, it's difficult to believe Jokhadze is not a well-known personality in Georgia!
Sionk (
talk) 11:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep Performer has taken part in Eurovision before (see link
http://natfinals.50webs.com/Georgia2012.html) and is taking part in his own right. Is clearly a star in his own country even though English language sources might be found wanting. Taking part in an international competition should satisfy GNG and ARTIST.
doktorbwordsdeeds 12:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Seriously Strong Keep If such articles become deleted, then we'd might as well start deleting all articles relating to one-time participants in Eurovision, and create a black hole in a project. Many English-speaking users worldwide rely on such Eurovision-related articles for the purpose of research for whatever reasons, whether it be pub quizzes, or general enthusiasm for the Eurovision Song Contest, and everything - artist(s) and song(s). Don't start crashing down a European heritage and cause a huge research black hole.
Wesley☀Mouse 17:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Nomination Withdrawn The article looks much better than it did the other day. Now we have four sources. It still has some grammar issues, but that can be easily taken care of. -
Aaron Booth (
talk) 17:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.