The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There has been almost nothing in the article since 2011. It only has one reference, and isn't notable.
Analog Horror, (
Communicate) 06:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Pretty much all valid/accepted genera are notable and worthy of inclusion as encyclopedia articles (see WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES). I also expanded the article a bit. —
Hyperik⌜
talk⌟ 01:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Name genera are notable. Searching in google book brings up sources, and regardless per
WP:5P1 Wikipedia is also a gazetteer, and this article falls within that.--
Eostrix (
talk) 07:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as per the above mentioned matters/reasons.
Ali Ahwazi (
talk) 17:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, apart from species being inherently notable, meets
WP:GNG, improvements to the article reflect this.
Coolabahapple (
talk) 06:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Passes notability. However some more detailed information on the subject would be neccessary. -
The9Man | (
talk) 07:07, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There has been almost nothing in the article since 2011. It only has one reference, and isn't notable.
Analog Horror, (
Communicate) 06:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Pretty much all valid/accepted genera are notable and worthy of inclusion as encyclopedia articles (see WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES). I also expanded the article a bit. —
Hyperik⌜
talk⌟ 01:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Name genera are notable. Searching in google book brings up sources, and regardless per
WP:5P1 Wikipedia is also a gazetteer, and this article falls within that.--
Eostrix (
talk) 07:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as per the above mentioned matters/reasons.
Ali Ahwazi (
talk) 17:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, apart from species being inherently notable, meets
WP:GNG, improvements to the article reflect this.
Coolabahapple (
talk) 06:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Passes notability. However some more detailed information on the subject would be neccessary. -
The9Man | (
talk) 07:07, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.