- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 21:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Annika Lillemets
- Annika Lillemets ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't conform to WP:BIO. Reads like an advert in current form. Devopam ( talk) 07:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NPOL #1. The article is pretty neutral, but deletion generally isn't the right way to address issues with tone in short articles on notable subjects. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 07:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep She is a member the Swedish parliament and therefore clearly meets our notability guideline for politicians. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 09:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Article on an elected parliamentarian, referenced to the Riksdag website. Meets criterion 1 of WP:POLITICIAN. AllyD ( talk) 11:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:POLITICIAN, and this reads, and read when nominated, nothing at all like an advert. 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 13:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep As an MEP, plus the additional material available in her Swedish language article ready to be added here. Article needs expansion, not deletion. Alansohn ( talk) 15:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 21:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Annika Lillemets
- Annika Lillemets ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't conform to WP:BIO. Reads like an advert in current form. Devopam ( talk) 07:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NPOL #1. The article is pretty neutral, but deletion generally isn't the right way to address issues with tone in short articles on notable subjects. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 07:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep She is a member the Swedish parliament and therefore clearly meets our notability guideline for politicians. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 09:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Article on an elected parliamentarian, referenced to the Riksdag website. Meets criterion 1 of WP:POLITICIAN. AllyD ( talk) 11:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:POLITICIAN, and this reads, and read when nominated, nothing at all like an advert. 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 13:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep As an MEP, plus the additional material available in her Swedish language article ready to be added here. Article needs expansion, not deletion. Alansohn ( talk) 15:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.