The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Biblioworm 19:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Created in 2006, this has never had an independent source. Tagged to that effect for four years, tagged for notability for 18+ months. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, and EBSCO found almost nothing for this Ankur Group, only ~75 words that appear to originate with the organization,
[1] and the same brief paragraph repeated in a list of 2007-2008 initiatives.
[2] Wikipedia is not a directory of all software groups that exist or have ever existed. Without significant coverage in independent reliable sources, does not satisfy
WP:GROUP.
Worldbruce (
talk) 18:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Hardly acceptable article especially with all this ample time to improve it, there's nothing to suggest even minimally better notability and improvement.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete It's unsourced, so even if notable would require a 100% rewrite, and it contains unsourced BLP info. Note that there is a Bengali Wikipedia page, but it has had no prose edits since 2006. @
Aftabuzzaman: made an edit on the article there as well as the one here, and is active here, so I am pinging him. If deleted, there are three pages that will need editing:
Ankur,
IndLinux, and
Indic computing; and
Ankur Bangla will need deleting.
Unscintillating (
talk) 01:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Biblioworm 19:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Created in 2006, this has never had an independent source. Tagged to that effect for four years, tagged for notability for 18+ months. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, and EBSCO found almost nothing for this Ankur Group, only ~75 words that appear to originate with the organization,
[1] and the same brief paragraph repeated in a list of 2007-2008 initiatives.
[2] Wikipedia is not a directory of all software groups that exist or have ever existed. Without significant coverage in independent reliable sources, does not satisfy
WP:GROUP.
Worldbruce (
talk) 18:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Hardly acceptable article especially with all this ample time to improve it, there's nothing to suggest even minimally better notability and improvement.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete It's unsourced, so even if notable would require a 100% rewrite, and it contains unsourced BLP info. Note that there is a Bengali Wikipedia page, but it has had no prose edits since 2006. @
Aftabuzzaman: made an edit on the article there as well as the one here, and is active here, so I am pinging him. If deleted, there are three pages that will need editing:
Ankur,
IndLinux, and
Indic computing; and
Ankur Bangla will need deleting.
Unscintillating (
talk) 01:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.