The result was keep. John254 00:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Next to no information exists on Anjana in Hinduism other than how she gave birth to Hanuman, which is more relevant to, and discussed in, his article. The article consists solely of "Mother of Hanuman", and a message asking that the article not be deleted in order to prevent red links, and something to do with preventing confusion with the article Anjani. Laïka 23:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Some thing may be nonsense to one can make sense to some else so whetether civility does not ask to mind the langugae during the discussion?
Thanks any way
Mahitgar ( talk) 08:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Next to no information exists on Anjana in Hinduism other than how she gave birth to Hanuman, which is more relevant to, and discussed in, his article. The article consists solely of "Mother of Hanuman", and a message asking that the article not be deleted in order to prevent red links, and something to do with preventing confusion with the article Anjani. Laïka 23:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Some thing may be nonsense to one can make sense to some else so whetether civility does not ask to mind the langugae during the discussion?
Thanks any way
Mahitgar ( talk) 08:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply