The result was merge to Animax Asia. Stifle ( talk) 09:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable station/offshoot which fails to be verifiable due to lack of sourcing to reliable 3rd parties covering the subject in a significant manner. PROD and PROD2 tags removed without explaination. Additionally, much of the article is an exact duplicate of the other Animax articles Jasynnash2 ( talk) 09:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Animax Korea can merge with Animax Asia because there is Animax Korea wiki Korean page but Animax India should not be merge with Animax Asia because Animax India (South Asia)'s programming differs from Animax Asia and the channels in East Asia, and is not a separate feed of Animax Asia, its broadcast by and is a sister channel of SONY TV India based in India. Animax Japan and Animax India while based in Asia are different from Animax Asia, Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong, in programming, management and broadcasting and there are many more reasons in it---- Sumit ( talk) 13:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Animax Asia. Stifle ( talk) 09:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC) reply
non-notable station/offshoot which fails to be verifiable due to lack of sourcing to reliable 3rd parties covering the subject in a significant manner. PROD and PROD2 tags removed without explaination. Additionally, much of the article is an exact duplicate of the other Animax articles Jasynnash2 ( talk) 09:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Animax Korea can merge with Animax Asia because there is Animax Korea wiki Korean page but Animax India should not be merge with Animax Asia because Animax India (South Asia)'s programming differs from Animax Asia and the channels in East Asia, and is not a separate feed of Animax Asia, its broadcast by and is a sister channel of SONY TV India based in India. Animax Japan and Animax India while based in Asia are different from Animax Asia, Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong, in programming, management and broadcasting and there are many more reasons in it---- Sumit ( talk) 13:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC) reply