The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This should really be speedied for being advertisement, but it's been here a while and after all that time, what's another week. The article lacks all secondary sourcing, and while it is possible that there is something, a quick source for the name and the name of the founder delivers nothing. Moreover, I think that this is a case where BEFORE should really apply to the article creator,
JesseClifton, and the person who paid them,
Vipul: click the link to see to which extent WALLED GARDEN might apply as well, esp. in connection to articles like
Jacy Reese Anthis,
Sentience Politics,
Sentience Institute, and
Effective altruism.
The article is almost irredeemably promotional, and might as well be copied and pasted onto the organization's website. For all I know that's where it came from.
Drmies (
talk)
23:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. There seems to be some degree of coverage, but the sources I could find are rather
WP:QUESTIONABLE, and wouldn't count towards GNG. In any case, the text of the article is IMO too promotional to be of any use in a rewritten article —
WP:TNT applies. (and I don't mean just in favour of the organisation. While it might be a noble cause, well...) I did find a Wired article that I was hopeful about, but it turned out to be a passing mention mainly about another animal rights group. At least there seems to be no new copyvios since it was RD1ed back in 2018.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c)
14:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This should really be speedied for being advertisement, but it's been here a while and after all that time, what's another week. The article lacks all secondary sourcing, and while it is possible that there is something, a quick source for the name and the name of the founder delivers nothing. Moreover, I think that this is a case where BEFORE should really apply to the article creator,
JesseClifton, and the person who paid them,
Vipul: click the link to see to which extent WALLED GARDEN might apply as well, esp. in connection to articles like
Jacy Reese Anthis,
Sentience Politics,
Sentience Institute, and
Effective altruism.
The article is almost irredeemably promotional, and might as well be copied and pasted onto the organization's website. For all I know that's where it came from.
Drmies (
talk)
23:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. There seems to be some degree of coverage, but the sources I could find are rather
WP:QUESTIONABLE, and wouldn't count towards GNG. In any case, the text of the article is IMO too promotional to be of any use in a rewritten article —
WP:TNT applies. (and I don't mean just in favour of the organisation. While it might be a noble cause, well...) I did find a Wired article that I was hopeful about, but it turned out to be a passing mention mainly about another animal rights group. At least there seems to be no new copyvios since it was RD1ed back in 2018.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c)
14:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.