The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - I am not that familiar with Japanese models, but Michibata is quite famous outside the modeling business, appearing quite a lot on TV and in the entertainment press. The current article has many citations already, but I am not sure how good Model Press is as a source. So here are some citations from clearly reliable sources, mainly the mainstream entertainment press:
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6],
[7],
[8],
[9],
[10],
[11],
[12],
[13], etc. She thus has quite a lot of press exposure. I am not sure on what grounds the nominator asserts that she is not notable, but clearly she passes
WP:GNG.
Michitaro (
talk)
04:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep likely if all this coverage is considerable and acceptable and I would've even closed this as such but, as Japanese subjects are not my closely known areas, I'll have it open for any available comments.
SwisterTwistertalk07:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - I am not that familiar with Japanese models, but Michibata is quite famous outside the modeling business, appearing quite a lot on TV and in the entertainment press. The current article has many citations already, but I am not sure how good Model Press is as a source. So here are some citations from clearly reliable sources, mainly the mainstream entertainment press:
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6],
[7],
[8],
[9],
[10],
[11],
[12],
[13], etc. She thus has quite a lot of press exposure. I am not sure on what grounds the nominator asserts that she is not notable, but clearly she passes
WP:GNG.
Michitaro (
talk)
04:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep likely if all this coverage is considerable and acceptable and I would've even closed this as such but, as Japanese subjects are not my closely known areas, I'll have it open for any available comments.
SwisterTwistertalk07:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.