The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep obviously not an A7 and any promo can be edited out. Has created a number of notable works and has some of his films in the permanent collections of notable museums such as the MOMA and therefore passes
WP:NCREATIVE as well as
WP:NARTIST with plenty of reliable sources coverage already in the article, thanks
Atlantic306 (
talk)
23:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep. Definately not an A7 or even G11. Probably more of a technical pass of
WP:NCREATIVE (it is easier for a copy of a film to be held, although it does imply that the notable museums does want it); doesn't screen that well on a general GNG. A niche artist, but a pass on WP policy none the less.
Britishfinance (
talk)
19:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep At least two of his films (Chronicle of Corpses and Story of the Eye) have been reviewed in the New York Times and similarly respected publications, and
this Philadelphia Weekly interview cited in the article shows the existence of some coverage focused on the director himself, rather than one of his films. That said, the article needs a lot of work to meet quality standards. Very few independent/non-primary sources currently cited, lots of extraneous (non-verifiable) detail, and some style issues (e.g. proliferation of red links).
Colin M (
talk)
22:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep obviously not an A7 and any promo can be edited out. Has created a number of notable works and has some of his films in the permanent collections of notable museums such as the MOMA and therefore passes
WP:NCREATIVE as well as
WP:NARTIST with plenty of reliable sources coverage already in the article, thanks
Atlantic306 (
talk)
23:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep. Definately not an A7 or even G11. Probably more of a technical pass of
WP:NCREATIVE (it is easier for a copy of a film to be held, although it does imply that the notable museums does want it); doesn't screen that well on a general GNG. A niche artist, but a pass on WP policy none the less.
Britishfinance (
talk)
19:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep At least two of his films (Chronicle of Corpses and Story of the Eye) have been reviewed in the New York Times and similarly respected publications, and
this Philadelphia Weekly interview cited in the article shows the existence of some coverage focused on the director himself, rather than one of his films. That said, the article needs a lot of work to meet quality standards. Very few independent/non-primary sources currently cited, lots of extraneous (non-verifiable) detail, and some style issues (e.g. proliferation of red links).
Colin M (
talk)
22:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.