The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. No reliable sources.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 12:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Appears to be the person's own ideas with a few un-relaible sources to webpages that don't specifically document the topic.
RailwayScientist (
talk) 13:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete as hoax. And a trout slap to article creator, in fact, shouldn't such a disruptive editor be blocked? or otherwise supervised, sanctioned?
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 17:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Please delete the article. I confirm that the article is a hoax, I had created it with the intention of examining how much time it would take for Wikipedia editors to realize it, I'm glad with the results.
Marcosoldfox (
talk) 09:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. No reliable sources.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 12:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Appears to be the person's own ideas with a few un-relaible sources to webpages that don't specifically document the topic.
RailwayScientist (
talk) 13:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete as hoax. And a trout slap to article creator, in fact, shouldn't such a disruptive editor be blocked? or otherwise supervised, sanctioned?
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 17:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Please delete the article. I confirm that the article is a hoax, I had created it with the intention of examining how much time it would take for Wikipedia editors to realize it, I'm glad with the results.
Marcosoldfox (
talk) 09:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.