The result was keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / { talk} 07:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Speedy Delete, re-creation of deleted content. After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Grace (2nd nomination) saw a “delete” outcome, I feel that the time has come to determine which of the American Idol contestants truly deserve their own articles. WP:NOTINHERITED tells us that just because somebody appeared on American Idol, it doesn’t make them notable and worthy of an article. This fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. DJ 08:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep I've heard of her name before, not quite positive where but the article has withstood the test of time, keep. Str8cash ( talk) 19:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply
This sort of mass nomination is unproductive because it leads to people voting based on "I like it"/"I don't like it" since no one can reasonably be expected to properly research 38 articles of the same nature in a week. (Indeed this has already begun to happen.) Since the results of these AfDs are likely to be influenced by voting rather than a proper discussion, they should all be closed with no prejudice against reopening a few at a time after a good faith attempt to determine notability has been made. -- ThaddeusB ( talk) 22:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep Per Thaddeus but I swear I am going to yell from the roof tops if I keep seeing "BLP" being mentioned everywhere. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / { talk} 07:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Speedy Delete, re-creation of deleted content. After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Grace (2nd nomination) saw a “delete” outcome, I feel that the time has come to determine which of the American Idol contestants truly deserve their own articles. WP:NOTINHERITED tells us that just because somebody appeared on American Idol, it doesn’t make them notable and worthy of an article. This fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. DJ 08:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep I've heard of her name before, not quite positive where but the article has withstood the test of time, keep. Str8cash ( talk) 19:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply
This sort of mass nomination is unproductive because it leads to people voting based on "I like it"/"I don't like it" since no one can reasonably be expected to properly research 38 articles of the same nature in a week. (Indeed this has already begun to happen.) Since the results of these AfDs are likely to be influenced by voting rather than a proper discussion, they should all be closed with no prejudice against reopening a few at a time after a good faith attempt to determine notability has been made. -- ThaddeusB ( talk) 22:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep Per Thaddeus but I swear I am going to yell from the roof tops if I keep seeing "BLP" being mentioned everywhere. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC) reply