From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 15:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC) reply

American Desperado (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article currently fails WP:GNG, and there is nothing of substance in the article to suggest that it could pass GNG. Nearly all of the content is verbatim copy of publisher content from amazon (that actually no longer exists and cannot be verified), which suggests WP:PROMOTIONAL. Simply existing as a published work is not sufficient to be notable. ButlerBlog ( talk) 15:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 15:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC) reply

American Desperado (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article currently fails WP:GNG, and there is nothing of substance in the article to suggest that it could pass GNG. Nearly all of the content is verbatim copy of publisher content from amazon (that actually no longer exists and cannot be verified), which suggests WP:PROMOTIONAL. Simply existing as a published work is not sufficient to be notable. ButlerBlog ( talk) 15:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook