The result was no consensus John Reaves (talk) 01:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC) reply
It's been nearly two years since the original AFD (found here), and there is still not a valid argument present in the article explaining why Ms. Rose is notable per WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Tabercil 22:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus John Reaves (talk) 01:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC) reply
It's been nearly two years since the original AFD (found here), and there is still not a valid argument present in the article explaining why Ms. Rose is notable per WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Tabercil 22:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC) reply