The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subspecies are not inherently notable, while species are. Author declines to merge to the species article. -
UtherSRG(talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
There are many subspecies based articles. If you want to remove them the why not remove all of them? See Category:subspecies
Uploader1234567890 (
talk) 14:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)reply
As I said, subspecies are not inherently notable. That doesn't mean no subspecies are notable, just that the notability of a subspecies must be demonstrated. Your argument is
WP:WHATABOUTISM and that doesn't fly here. -
UtherSRG(talk) 11:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge to Amantia peruana, as with Amantia peruana peruana. There isn't any new information in each subspecies article that isn't in the species article, except an unsourced sentence about etymology. It would be great to see additional information about the subspecies, but it would still be more appropriate for a merged article presenting all the information in one place rather than three separate articles with a high level of duplication.
Mgp28 (
talk) 22:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per
Mgp28's rationale, but I think
WP:PM would have been a better venue for this.
jlwoodwa (
talk) 19:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merger was proposed but rejected by the author. -
UtherSRG(talk) 12:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
UtherSRG: Just because someone wrote the first version of a page doesn't mean they
WP:OWN it. They can't unilaterally reject merging it, any more than they can unilaterally reject its deletion.
jlwoodwa (
talk) 02:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Subspecies are not inherently notable, while species are. Author declines to merge to the species article. -
UtherSRG(talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
There are many subspecies based articles. If you want to remove them the why not remove all of them? See Category:subspecies
Uploader1234567890 (
talk) 14:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)reply
As I said, subspecies are not inherently notable. That doesn't mean no subspecies are notable, just that the notability of a subspecies must be demonstrated. Your argument is
WP:WHATABOUTISM and that doesn't fly here. -
UtherSRG(talk) 11:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge to Amantia peruana, as with Amantia peruana peruana. There isn't any new information in each subspecies article that isn't in the species article, except an unsourced sentence about etymology. It would be great to see additional information about the subspecies, but it would still be more appropriate for a merged article presenting all the information in one place rather than three separate articles with a high level of duplication.
Mgp28 (
talk) 22:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per
Mgp28's rationale, but I think
WP:PM would have been a better venue for this.
jlwoodwa (
talk) 19:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Merger was proposed but rejected by the author. -
UtherSRG(talk) 12:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
UtherSRG: Just because someone wrote the first version of a page doesn't mean they
WP:OWN it. They can't unilaterally reject merging it, any more than they can unilaterally reject its deletion.
jlwoodwa (
talk) 02:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.