- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 10:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Amanda McQuade Crawford
- Amanda McQuade Crawford ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:BLP and WP:GNG. Sources are all weak online business websites that are affiliated with subject. Delta13C ( talk) 02:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete A search for coverage of this herbalist in reliable sources uncovered only promotional backscratching in fringe sources. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree, mainly promo. Long bibliography seems to mostly be web ephemera with some dead links. Agricola44 ( talk) 20:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC).
- Delete - Couldn't find the independent sources in the midst of the promotional language. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 05:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 10:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Amanda McQuade Crawford
- Amanda McQuade Crawford ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:BLP and WP:GNG. Sources are all weak online business websites that are affiliated with subject. Delta13C ( talk) 02:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete A search for coverage of this herbalist in reliable sources uncovered only promotional backscratching in fringe sources. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree, mainly promo. Long bibliography seems to mostly be web ephemera with some dead links. Agricola44 ( talk) 20:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC).
- Delete - Couldn't find the independent sources in the midst of the promotional language. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 05:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.