The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. If you search ocregister.com (the local newspaper) for "Alton Parkway" you can find quite a few hits, the first dozen or so of which are stories over a wide spread of years about an extension that was promised for years and opened on 2012. It's an important arterial for local traffic and planning purposes. But that doesn't make it notable for Wikipedia, and I don't know of any historical or landmark value that it serves; it's really just a road. One of many stubby, unsourced, and non-notable Wikipedia articles on roads in this area created repeatedly by the same user; see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Hill Avenue for another. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
02:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Quick question though -- hypothetically, if this article gets deleted, and the original author creates it again, do we have to go through a 7-day [[WP:AFD}] a second time? How often can he keep doing this in theory before an admin or somebody says, "enough is enough"?
107.77.202.170 (
talk)
20:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)reply
After a full AfD returns a delete decision, if the article gets recreated again in substantially the same form, it can be speedily deleted without a discussion or waiting period via
WP:CSD#G4. And if it is repeatedly recreated and deleted, an administrator can protect it so that it can't be created again without changing the protection. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
23:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. If you search ocregister.com (the local newspaper) for "Alton Parkway" you can find quite a few hits, the first dozen or so of which are stories over a wide spread of years about an extension that was promised for years and opened on 2012. It's an important arterial for local traffic and planning purposes. But that doesn't make it notable for Wikipedia, and I don't know of any historical or landmark value that it serves; it's really just a road. One of many stubby, unsourced, and non-notable Wikipedia articles on roads in this area created repeatedly by the same user; see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Hill Avenue for another. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
02:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Quick question though -- hypothetically, if this article gets deleted, and the original author creates it again, do we have to go through a 7-day [[WP:AFD}] a second time? How often can he keep doing this in theory before an admin or somebody says, "enough is enough"?
107.77.202.170 (
talk)
20:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)reply
After a full AfD returns a delete decision, if the article gets recreated again in substantially the same form, it can be speedily deleted without a discussion or waiting period via
WP:CSD#G4. And if it is repeatedly recreated and deleted, an administrator can protect it so that it can't be created again without changing the protection. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
23:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.