The result was merge to Fernando Alonso. MBisanz talk 07:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Although article contains sources, I don't think this "fanbase" is notable enough for its own page even if there are some RS. I guess a merge to Fernando Alonso is possible... other than that, delete. D.M.N. ( talk) 09:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC) reply
It seems, from what is available in sources, that there should be a redirect here, since its an alternative name for the subject that is clearly in use, but that there's no distinct subject to be had. This at most is a paragraph, perhaps two, in the article about the person. (Subtract the duplication of the biography from this article, and that's pretty much the amount that one has left.)
Put another way: Per User:Uncle G/On notability#Dealing with non-notable things, no source documents this subject in depth. All sources simply discuss it briefly and tangentially (a couple of sentences at most) in the context of Alonso himself. So, too, therefore, should Wikipedia. Wikipedia should do as the sources do. And per the notability guidelines, therefore, since independent sources exist, but they don't document the subject in depth, redirection or merger into an article with a broader subject is the answer.
Of course, deletion isn't necessary for merger. Even an editor without an account can perform a merger. There's no reason to waste the effort that Guroadrunner ( talk · contribs) has put in to making the few sentences verifiable. Uncle G ( talk) 15:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Fernando Alonso. MBisanz talk 07:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Although article contains sources, I don't think this "fanbase" is notable enough for its own page even if there are some RS. I guess a merge to Fernando Alonso is possible... other than that, delete. D.M.N. ( talk) 09:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC) reply
It seems, from what is available in sources, that there should be a redirect here, since its an alternative name for the subject that is clearly in use, but that there's no distinct subject to be had. This at most is a paragraph, perhaps two, in the article about the person. (Subtract the duplication of the biography from this article, and that's pretty much the amount that one has left.)
Put another way: Per User:Uncle G/On notability#Dealing with non-notable things, no source documents this subject in depth. All sources simply discuss it briefly and tangentially (a couple of sentences at most) in the context of Alonso himself. So, too, therefore, should Wikipedia. Wikipedia should do as the sources do. And per the notability guidelines, therefore, since independent sources exist, but they don't document the subject in depth, redirection or merger into an article with a broader subject is the answer.
Of course, deletion isn't necessary for merger. Even an editor without an account can perform a merger. There's no reason to waste the effort that Guroadrunner ( talk · contribs) has put in to making the few sentences verifiable. Uncle G ( talk) 15:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC) reply