From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole Keep !vote does not seem to cite specific policy/guideline on why the article is notable, and is specifically rebuffed. As such, notability does not appear to be demonstrated Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Almon, Missouri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this place passes WP:GEOLAND. GNIS sources it to a rural schools map (Since school != actual community in the time this was active in rural America, it seems a little odd to source it to a school directory) and gives it a census code of U6, which means it is not an officially incorporated place, meaning it likely fails WP:GEOLAND. Does not appear on pre-GNIS small-scale topos. The State Historical Society calls it a post office. A search for coverage only brings up a bunch of WP:SPS family histories and mentions that someone "from" Almon died. Does not seem to meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens ( talk) 01:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 04:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole Keep !vote does not seem to cite specific policy/guideline on why the article is notable, and is specifically rebuffed. As such, notability does not appear to be demonstrated Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Almon, Missouri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this place passes WP:GEOLAND. GNIS sources it to a rural schools map (Since school != actual community in the time this was active in rural America, it seems a little odd to source it to a school directory) and gives it a census code of U6, which means it is not an officially incorporated place, meaning it likely fails WP:GEOLAND. Does not appear on pre-GNIS small-scale topos. The State Historical Society calls it a post office. A search for coverage only brings up a bunch of WP:SPS family histories and mentions that someone "from" Almon died. Does not seem to meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens ( talk) 01:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 04:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook