- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Duplicate nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allie X (2nd nomination) ( non-admin closure) shoy ( reactions) 18:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Allie X ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article subject is not notable. She is still early in her singing endeavors. She has not surpassed the threshold of notability and fails WP:GNG. She may have sang a song that briefly charted but that makes the song notable not her. Notability is not inferred to one by a song or book for Fodor example. She fails WP:GNG because she herself has not received significant coverage coverage over numerous [WP:RS]]. Unreliable sourcing has been rampant in the article to include no logs, Twitter, YouTube, and also almost half of the citations are only interviews from from unreliable sources. It is just WP:TOOSOON WordSeventeen ( talk) 04:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC) DELETE as nominator for reasoning as above. WordSeventeen ( talk) 14:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy close - this is a duplicate of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allie X (2nd nomination). Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 17:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Duplicate nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allie X (2nd nomination) ( non-admin closure) shoy ( reactions) 18:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Allie X ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article subject is not notable. She is still early in her singing endeavors. She has not surpassed the threshold of notability and fails WP:GNG. She may have sang a song that briefly charted but that makes the song notable not her. Notability is not inferred to one by a song or book for Fodor example. She fails WP:GNG because she herself has not received significant coverage coverage over numerous [WP:RS]]. Unreliable sourcing has been rampant in the article to include no logs, Twitter, YouTube, and also almost half of the citations are only interviews from from unreliable sources. It is just WP:TOOSOON WordSeventeen ( talk) 04:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC) DELETE as nominator for reasoning as above. WordSeventeen ( talk) 14:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy close - this is a duplicate of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allie X (2nd nomination). Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 17:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.