The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Irrevelant information about a non-notable school that often gets edits that make the topic even more irrevelant and are often inappropiate. Also has information that is not verifiable.
DanielES1503:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Assuming you mean
Allen High School (Allen, Texas)? In which case, the article is a mess and needs that "metal detectors" section removed, but if any of the rest of the text is actually true, then it might just be the first known example of an actually notable school brought to AfD.
Opabinia regalis03:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
keep Its metal detectors section needs cleaning, but outright deletion is a bit too much. With all the claims made in the article, I can not see how this school is irrelevant, claims to have the biggest marching band, won state finals in something, the list goes on. Reasoning needs to be more detailed and objective for me to even consider it.
Mgm|
(talk)08:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep: Nomination is defective The nomination is ambiguous, since there are 3 Allen High Schools with articles. Identify the article you wish to delete, or nominate all three. This nomination should be withdrawn and resubmitted.
Edison14:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep — Somebody must have moved the page to Allen High School (Allen, Texas) after the AfD was added. The later page meets my standards for High School notability. It also appears to be a candidate to meet the proposed
WP:SCHOOL guidelines for notability, although it needs to cite sources. The original page is just a disambig. page and should also be kept. Thanks. —
RJH (
talk)
17:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Irrevelant information about a non-notable school that often gets edits that make the topic even more irrevelant and are often inappropiate. Also has information that is not verifiable.
DanielES1503:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Assuming you mean
Allen High School (Allen, Texas)? In which case, the article is a mess and needs that "metal detectors" section removed, but if any of the rest of the text is actually true, then it might just be the first known example of an actually notable school brought to AfD.
Opabinia regalis03:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
keep Its metal detectors section needs cleaning, but outright deletion is a bit too much. With all the claims made in the article, I can not see how this school is irrelevant, claims to have the biggest marching band, won state finals in something, the list goes on. Reasoning needs to be more detailed and objective for me to even consider it.
Mgm|
(talk)08:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep: Nomination is defective The nomination is ambiguous, since there are 3 Allen High Schools with articles. Identify the article you wish to delete, or nominate all three. This nomination should be withdrawn and resubmitted.
Edison14:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep — Somebody must have moved the page to Allen High School (Allen, Texas) after the AfD was added. The later page meets my standards for High School notability. It also appears to be a candidate to meet the proposed
WP:SCHOOL guidelines for notability, although it needs to cite sources. The original page is just a disambig. page and should also be kept. Thanks. —
RJH (
talk)
17:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.