- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
All Events In City
- All Events In City ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Supposed links to show awards is a dead link. Two others are YouTube videos and one is a simple own advert. Nothing here even close to WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 14:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 17:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 17:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Simply nothing to suggest better notability at this time. SwisterTwister talk 06:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The Youtube link is actually a CNBC Link, plus there is a Hindu link, so that makes it two reliable sources. -_ Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 21:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Yann ( talk) 10:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the article passed 2 of WP:GNG and also won two notably awards ..-- Bello96 ( talk) 20:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak delete - The CNBC piece is an interview, and therefore, being a primary source, does not go to notability. The Hindu Business Line article is very good, but it raises an issue about the article's title, since the Hindu article never calls this company by the wiki article's title (same as the CNBC piece). Searches did not turn up enough other in-depth coverage to show it passes GNG, it certainly doesn't pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Finally, the overwhelmingly promotional tone of the article makes it an excellent candidate for WP:TNT. If it is somehow kept, the title needs to be changed to the correct name as per the sources, which refer to allevents.in. It would also need to be stubified to the only one or two non-promotional lines in the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
All Events In City
- All Events In City ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Supposed links to show awards is a dead link. Two others are YouTube videos and one is a simple own advert. Nothing here even close to WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 14:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 17:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 17:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Simply nothing to suggest better notability at this time. SwisterTwister talk 06:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The Youtube link is actually a CNBC Link, plus there is a Hindu link, so that makes it two reliable sources. -_ Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 21:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Yann ( talk) 10:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the article passed 2 of WP:GNG and also won two notably awards ..-- Bello96 ( talk) 20:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak delete - The CNBC piece is an interview, and therefore, being a primary source, does not go to notability. The Hindu Business Line article is very good, but it raises an issue about the article's title, since the Hindu article never calls this company by the wiki article's title (same as the CNBC piece). Searches did not turn up enough other in-depth coverage to show it passes GNG, it certainly doesn't pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Finally, the overwhelmingly promotional tone of the article makes it an excellent candidate for WP:TNT. If it is somehow kept, the title needs to be changed to the correct name as per the sources, which refer to allevents.in. It would also need to be stubified to the only one or two non-promotional lines in the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.