The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 23:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:SPAM, WP:ORG. WP:COI issues too RayAYang ( talk) 18:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. Passes
WP:V but misses the mark on
WP:N which is more fundamental.
Themfromspace (
talk) 01:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Keep
WP:GNGIf a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be a suitable article topic." The marketing press is of the subject, but the university press is independent of the subject —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
74.186.108.48 (
talk •
contribs) 00:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 23:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:SPAM, WP:ORG. WP:COI issues too RayAYang ( talk) 18:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. Passes
WP:V but misses the mark on
WP:N which is more fundamental.
Themfromspace (
talk) 01:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Keep
WP:GNGIf a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be a suitable article topic." The marketing press is of the subject, but the university press is independent of the subject —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
74.186.108.48 (
talk •
contribs) 00:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply