From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret account 01:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Alison Tyler (actress)

Alison Tyler (actress) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I really hate to do this because I love Alison Tyler, but she fails WP:PORNBIO because she has never been nominated for anything. I declined the BLPPROD myself because there is a source (albeit IMDb, but...). Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 06:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply

  • Actually, after further inspection (and this pains me even more), the closing admin might even want to salt this because the creator created this article three times already (and judging from his/her talk page, s/he might not have a grasp of what Wikipedia is all about). Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 06:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 06:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Notability assertion just barely clears A7. Lacks nontrivial reliable source coverage to pass GNG. Fails PORNBIO without awards or nominations. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete but do not salt. The problem is a general one with the article creator (25 or so speedy deletions mentioned on their talk page, including 6 copyvios since late November - and no evidence they've contributed to any talk pages). I've already taken them to WP:ANI and we can leave them to deal with any article protection. Neonchameleon ( talk) 18:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Makes no case for notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per reasons outlined above. WP:SNOW Finnegas ( talk) 20:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret account 01:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Alison Tyler (actress)

Alison Tyler (actress) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I really hate to do this because I love Alison Tyler, but she fails WP:PORNBIO because she has never been nominated for anything. I declined the BLPPROD myself because there is a source (albeit IMDb, but...). Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 06:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply

  • Actually, after further inspection (and this pains me even more), the closing admin might even want to salt this because the creator created this article three times already (and judging from his/her talk page, s/he might not have a grasp of what Wikipedia is all about). Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 06:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 06:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Notability assertion just barely clears A7. Lacks nontrivial reliable source coverage to pass GNG. Fails PORNBIO without awards or nominations. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete but do not salt. The problem is a general one with the article creator (25 or so speedy deletions mentioned on their talk page, including 6 copyvios since late November - and no evidence they've contributed to any talk pages). I've already taken them to WP:ANI and we can leave them to deal with any article protection. Neonchameleon ( talk) 18:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Makes no case for notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per reasons outlined above. WP:SNOW Finnegas ( talk) 20:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook