The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: First source is a passing mention in a book that is devoted to
Chuvash history. Second is a conference paper held in the region the artist hailed from. Updated comment: I took a look at the Russian sources and a couple of them reference to the
Chuvash Republic government site[1][2], which is obviously not a reliable source. One is a reference to a statement commemorating the artist by the National Museum of the Chuchav Republic[3]. There is also another source that is a passing mention (artist referenced to 1 page) in a 420 page book[4]. Four links are dead[5][6][7][8]. One reference is to a catalogue of the artist's work[9]. One is to a open Russian database of artists[10]. That's pretty much what the Russians sources are. P.S @
Eostrix: If there is a more streamlined or efficient way to comment with the references and evidence of non-notability please let me know, I'm new around here!
Nearlyevil665 (
talk)
12:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Being catalogued and being honored by a state government (
Chuvashia) are also signs of notability. There are a whole lot of hits in google books for Кокель 1880 (most of which refer to this artist).--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉)13:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
You misunderstood. He wasn't honoured by the Chuvash Republic. There were simply references to him on their government website, which was most likely for the purposes of promoting tourism to their region. Those two links are now dead too, by the way. There is no way to confirm what those government website references constituted, but my best guess is that it would be promotional. As for the cataloging, that too is blatantly non-notable. It was for a catalog produced in 1960 for the exhibition of the artist's works. Any artist that has ever had an exhibition could produce a reference to their own catalog of works. There is nothing to suggest that this particular catalog was of any note, quite the contrary.
Nearlyevil665 (
talk)
13:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
In regards to "Any artist that has ever had an exhibition could produce a reference to their own catalog of works", as Kokel was dead and buried for four years in 1960 it would be quite a feat (a miracle, even) for him to produce his own catalog for the exhibition.--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉)13:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
I stand corrected it would have taken necromancy for the man to produce his own catalog being dead and all, but I'm still not convinced a catalog produced for what appears to be a dubious local exhibition evidence in support of notability for said artist.
Nearlyevil665 (
talk)
15:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep. As far as I see from Russian language sources, he was one of the most important painters in Chuvashia. This link includes bibliography of more than 30 books in Russian, where he is mentioned, with first 6 books especially dedicated to him.
[3].
Arthistorian1977 (
talk)
12:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: First source is a passing mention in a book that is devoted to
Chuvash history. Second is a conference paper held in the region the artist hailed from. Updated comment: I took a look at the Russian sources and a couple of them reference to the
Chuvash Republic government site[1][2], which is obviously not a reliable source. One is a reference to a statement commemorating the artist by the National Museum of the Chuchav Republic[3]. There is also another source that is a passing mention (artist referenced to 1 page) in a 420 page book[4]. Four links are dead[5][6][7][8]. One reference is to a catalogue of the artist's work[9]. One is to a open Russian database of artists[10]. That's pretty much what the Russians sources are. P.S @
Eostrix: If there is a more streamlined or efficient way to comment with the references and evidence of non-notability please let me know, I'm new around here!
Nearlyevil665 (
talk)
12:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Being catalogued and being honored by a state government (
Chuvashia) are also signs of notability. There are a whole lot of hits in google books for Кокель 1880 (most of which refer to this artist).--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉)13:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
You misunderstood. He wasn't honoured by the Chuvash Republic. There were simply references to him on their government website, which was most likely for the purposes of promoting tourism to their region. Those two links are now dead too, by the way. There is no way to confirm what those government website references constituted, but my best guess is that it would be promotional. As for the cataloging, that too is blatantly non-notable. It was for a catalog produced in 1960 for the exhibition of the artist's works. Any artist that has ever had an exhibition could produce a reference to their own catalog of works. There is nothing to suggest that this particular catalog was of any note, quite the contrary.
Nearlyevil665 (
talk)
13:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
In regards to "Any artist that has ever had an exhibition could produce a reference to their own catalog of works", as Kokel was dead and buried for four years in 1960 it would be quite a feat (a miracle, even) for him to produce his own catalog for the exhibition.--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉)13:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
I stand corrected it would have taken necromancy for the man to produce his own catalog being dead and all, but I'm still not convinced a catalog produced for what appears to be a dubious local exhibition evidence in support of notability for said artist.
Nearlyevil665 (
talk)
15:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep. As far as I see from Russian language sources, he was one of the most important painters in Chuvashia. This link includes bibliography of more than 30 books in Russian, where he is mentioned, with first 6 books especially dedicated to him.
[3].
Arthistorian1977 (
talk)
12:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.