The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No evidence of a community. Maps show a cluster of farm buildings next to former train tracks which suggests this was some sort of railway point. – dlthewave ☎ 17:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
"Alden became a sugar beet dump and siding on the Crow Creek Branch of the
Union Pacific Railroad in 1910. It remained active as a siding and beet dump until 1965."
😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (
talk)
19:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)This very encyclopaedia has been a major part of an echo chamber of planetary scale, repeating and bolstering the falsehoods of other GNIS scrapers, whilst editors here have scraped bad GNIS data (see GNIS#Populated places and Project:Reliability of GNIS data and the whole mass deletion of Carlossuarez46 stubs) by the hundreds of thousands of "unincorporated community" substubs containing outright falsehoods. We have a Wikipedia:WikiProject California/GNIS cleanup task force project that is going to take years to undo the harm to human knowledge that we the editorship of Wikipedia have done, and that's just California. And as you can see we aren't the only WWW site with this problem.
Please break that cycle. Wikipedia has always been here to do better than the sort of rubbish that the WWW mainly contains. If memory serves, there's even a Jimmy Wales quote to that effect.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No evidence of a community. Maps show a cluster of farm buildings next to former train tracks which suggests this was some sort of railway point. – dlthewave ☎ 17:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
"Alden became a sugar beet dump and siding on the Crow Creek Branch of the
Union Pacific Railroad in 1910. It remained active as a siding and beet dump until 1965."
😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (
talk)
19:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)This very encyclopaedia has been a major part of an echo chamber of planetary scale, repeating and bolstering the falsehoods of other GNIS scrapers, whilst editors here have scraped bad GNIS data (see GNIS#Populated places and Project:Reliability of GNIS data and the whole mass deletion of Carlossuarez46 stubs) by the hundreds of thousands of "unincorporated community" substubs containing outright falsehoods. We have a Wikipedia:WikiProject California/GNIS cleanup task force project that is going to take years to undo the harm to human knowledge that we the editorship of Wikipedia have done, and that's just California. And as you can see we aren't the only WWW site with this problem.
Please break that cycle. Wikipedia has always been here to do better than the sort of rubbish that the WWW mainly contains. If memory serves, there's even a Jimmy Wales quote to that effect.