- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Alberto Peluffo
- Alberto Peluffo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined a CSD A7 as being a deputy mayor seems to clear the criteria and there are sources, which was then reverted with the summary "see talk page". Since the talk page had nothing on it, I'm coming here instead. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
I posted the following on the talk page. You probably just missed it.
According to WP:POLOUTCOMES: "Municipal politicians are not inherently notable just for being in politics, but neither are they inherently non-notable just because they are in local politics. Each case is evaluated on its own individual merits. Mayors of cities of at least regional prominence have usually survived AFD, although the article should say more than just "Jane Doe is the mayor of Cityville". Mayors of smaller towns, however, are generally deemed not notable just for being mayors, although they may be notable for other reasons in addition to their mayoralty (e.g. having previously held a more notable office). Note that this criterion has not generally been as restrictive as the criterion for city councillors. City councillors and other major municipal officers are not automatically notable, although precedent has tended to favor keeping members of the main citywide government of internationally famous metropolitan areas such as Toronto, Chicago, Tokyo, or London, or cities with populations of greater than 500,000. Losing candidates for municipal election are not considered inherently notable just for their candidacy and are generally deleted unless previous notability can be demonstrated."
This page is about the former Deputy Mayor (not even the Mayor) of a town with a population of 2,000. I think that qualifies for a deletion. Gamesmaster G-9 ( talk) 09:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Does not meet the notability criteria, neither as a local politician (as explained in the comments above), nor as an academician (the page of the mentioned academic society is itself proposed for deletion). 86.120.254.110 ( talk) 00:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete' Noli is closer to 3,000 people. For a few hundred years before 1797 it was a soveign place. On the other hand some small places not far from Caliabar in Nigeria were soverign in the early 1790s and I would not let stand a weak sourced article on their deputy mayor either. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment There is a discussion occurring at WP:POLOUTCOMES about the addition of the populations of greater than 500,000 phrase and whether that truly reflects the common outcome of municipal councilmembers. -- Enos733 ( talk) 16:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Being a deputy mayor is in no way an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia — at the size of Noli, even the mayor wouldn't constitute an automatic inclusion pass, let alone a city councillor. But nothing else here constitutes evidence that he's more notable than the norm, and the depth of sourcing simply isn't solid enough to claim WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat ( talk) 16:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Alberto Peluffo
- Alberto Peluffo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined a CSD A7 as being a deputy mayor seems to clear the criteria and there are sources, which was then reverted with the summary "see talk page". Since the talk page had nothing on it, I'm coming here instead. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
I posted the following on the talk page. You probably just missed it.
According to WP:POLOUTCOMES: "Municipal politicians are not inherently notable just for being in politics, but neither are they inherently non-notable just because they are in local politics. Each case is evaluated on its own individual merits. Mayors of cities of at least regional prominence have usually survived AFD, although the article should say more than just "Jane Doe is the mayor of Cityville". Mayors of smaller towns, however, are generally deemed not notable just for being mayors, although they may be notable for other reasons in addition to their mayoralty (e.g. having previously held a more notable office). Note that this criterion has not generally been as restrictive as the criterion for city councillors. City councillors and other major municipal officers are not automatically notable, although precedent has tended to favor keeping members of the main citywide government of internationally famous metropolitan areas such as Toronto, Chicago, Tokyo, or London, or cities with populations of greater than 500,000. Losing candidates for municipal election are not considered inherently notable just for their candidacy and are generally deleted unless previous notability can be demonstrated."
This page is about the former Deputy Mayor (not even the Mayor) of a town with a population of 2,000. I think that qualifies for a deletion. Gamesmaster G-9 ( talk) 09:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Does not meet the notability criteria, neither as a local politician (as explained in the comments above), nor as an academician (the page of the mentioned academic society is itself proposed for deletion). 86.120.254.110 ( talk) 00:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete' Noli is closer to 3,000 people. For a few hundred years before 1797 it was a soveign place. On the other hand some small places not far from Caliabar in Nigeria were soverign in the early 1790s and I would not let stand a weak sourced article on their deputy mayor either. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment There is a discussion occurring at WP:POLOUTCOMES about the addition of the populations of greater than 500,000 phrase and whether that truly reflects the common outcome of municipal councilmembers. -- Enos733 ( talk) 16:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Being a deputy mayor is in no way an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia — at the size of Noli, even the mayor wouldn't constitute an automatic inclusion pass, let alone a city councillor. But nothing else here constitutes evidence that he's more notable than the norm, and the depth of sourcing simply isn't solid enough to claim WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat ( talk) 16:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.