The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hoax? Completely unverifiable, both at "Bezuindenhout" (a name which doesn't exist) and "Bezuidenhout". The lone source is from 1912, so predates the works it supposedly references, and doesn't contain Bezui(n)denhout anyway. No other source could be found which even mentions this artist.
Fram (
talk)
10:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - The book cited in the article does not show up on Google Books, although I can find one vague reference to it being published in 1912, but no evidence that this book references Albanus Bezuindenhout. Notwithstanding that, I can find nothing on Google or Google Scholar mentioning Albanus Bezuindenhout so at the very least this seems to fail GNG, if not a hoax.
WJ94 (
talk)
11:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Oh my goodness!! I see albanus article is being nominated for deletion. I am belgian and my friend told me about this and told me to make a article. I thought it was strange nothing on google showed. But he told me this book was the source, and i never read the book so i didnt know any better!! please delete the article ASAP! I did not mean to make a hoax. I think my "friend" may be a troll or vandal. Delete this article "Albanus Bezuindenhout" and please dont put me in any wiki-troubles. Im new to the site.
Tooting! carrot 123dicey (
talk)
16:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hoax? Completely unverifiable, both at "Bezuindenhout" (a name which doesn't exist) and "Bezuidenhout". The lone source is from 1912, so predates the works it supposedly references, and doesn't contain Bezui(n)denhout anyway. No other source could be found which even mentions this artist.
Fram (
talk)
10:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - The book cited in the article does not show up on Google Books, although I can find one vague reference to it being published in 1912, but no evidence that this book references Albanus Bezuindenhout. Notwithstanding that, I can find nothing on Google or Google Scholar mentioning Albanus Bezuindenhout so at the very least this seems to fail GNG, if not a hoax.
WJ94 (
talk)
11:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Oh my goodness!! I see albanus article is being nominated for deletion. I am belgian and my friend told me about this and told me to make a article. I thought it was strange nothing on google showed. But he told me this book was the source, and i never read the book so i didnt know any better!! please delete the article ASAP! I did not mean to make a hoax. I think my "friend" may be a troll or vandal. Delete this article "Albanus Bezuindenhout" and please dont put me in any wiki-troubles. Im new to the site.
Tooting! carrot 123dicey (
talk)
16:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.