The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable article that cites no sources and for which I can find none in reliable book sources, such as Arnold, Parlett, Morehead and Mott-Smith. It appears to be merely a variation of Yukon being promoted commercially online.
Bermicourt (
talk)
12:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, basically. Delete as a non-notable patience variant failing
WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources. I have no clue where to look for in-depth coverage of the topic, so I defer to nom's book review on this. Web hits do not look GNG-compatible and mostly look like implementations and guides. —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK12:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak delete, I found nothing to suggest
WP:GNG. There's quite a few mentions in google, but nothing seems to be reliable and/or significant coverage. The variation doesn't seem to be notable at all, so a possible redirect to
List of patience games wouldn't make sense. I found almost nothing on Newspapers.com or various encyclopedias. The Encyclopedia of Play mentions "Alaska" in passing as a variation of Solitaire, but goes on to say "Counting all of the variations, the total Solitaire game repertoire is over 1,000", suggesting that just existing doesn't establish notability.
Eddie891TalkWork22:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable article that cites no sources and for which I can find none in reliable book sources, such as Arnold, Parlett, Morehead and Mott-Smith. It appears to be merely a variation of Yukon being promoted commercially online.
Bermicourt (
talk)
12:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, basically. Delete as a non-notable patience variant failing
WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources. I have no clue where to look for in-depth coverage of the topic, so I defer to nom's book review on this. Web hits do not look GNG-compatible and mostly look like implementations and guides. —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK12:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak delete, I found nothing to suggest
WP:GNG. There's quite a few mentions in google, but nothing seems to be reliable and/or significant coverage. The variation doesn't seem to be notable at all, so a possible redirect to
List of patience games wouldn't make sense. I found almost nothing on Newspapers.com or various encyclopedias. The Encyclopedia of Play mentions "Alaska" in passing as a variation of Solitaire, but goes on to say "Counting all of the variations, the total Solitaire game repertoire is over 1,000", suggesting that just existing doesn't establish notability.
Eddie891TalkWork22:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.