The result was keep. i see a consensus to Keep this article, also it has been greatly expanded since the nomination. Moreover, I see no support for Deleting this article since it has been expanded. Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG on substantive coverage and analysis about their work in reliable sources -- but this is referenced entirely to IMDb, and makes no meaningful notability claim beyond the fact of his existence.
While there are a lot of notable films in the filmography list, his credit on nearly all of them was "second unit/assistant director", which is in no way an "inherently" notable role that would constitute a "no sourcing required" freebie -- and while he later had some "associate producer" credits followed by one credit as a lead producer, that still isn't an inclusion freebie in the absence of adequate sourcing.
The article has been tagged for referencing improvement since 2016 without ever being improved -- and while the film he was a full producer on does have an article in which his name is listed in the infobox, this article gets so little attention that his name was never even wikilinked there.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more than just an IMDb profile for sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
16:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. i see a consensus to Keep this article, also it has been greatly expanded since the nomination. Moreover, I see no support for Deleting this article since it has been expanded. Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG on substantive coverage and analysis about their work in reliable sources -- but this is referenced entirely to IMDb, and makes no meaningful notability claim beyond the fact of his existence.
While there are a lot of notable films in the filmography list, his credit on nearly all of them was "second unit/assistant director", which is in no way an "inherently" notable role that would constitute a "no sourcing required" freebie -- and while he later had some "associate producer" credits followed by one credit as a lead producer, that still isn't an inclusion freebie in the absence of adequate sourcing.
The article has been tagged for referencing improvement since 2016 without ever being improved -- and while the film he was a full producer on does have an article in which his name is listed in the infobox, this article gets so little attention that his name was never even wikilinked there.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more than just an IMDb profile for sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
16:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)