The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep There is nothing called "notable train" and "non-notable train". This train
do exists and travels nearly half of India, covers distance more than 1500km. Thats enough. Even
Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations) doesn't talks anything about trains. --
Human3015TALK 01:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Most of the article should be deleted per
WP:NTT and the coverage that I found on google news did not meet
WP:CORPDEPTH. The coverage was just incidental and talked most about delays and cancellations.
So said The Great Wiki Lord. (
talk) 21:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - The article is pretty notable not just philosophically but also as per Wikipedia's notability policy
WP:N, see it is not always necessary to get notability in media when it comes to
India. D Mi™ 18:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep There is nothing called "notable train" and "non-notable train". This train
do exists and travels nearly half of India, covers distance more than 1500km. Thats enough. Even
Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations) doesn't talks anything about trains. --
Human3015TALK 01:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Most of the article should be deleted per
WP:NTT and the coverage that I found on google news did not meet
WP:CORPDEPTH. The coverage was just incidental and talked most about delays and cancellations.
So said The Great Wiki Lord. (
talk) 21:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - The article is pretty notable not just philosophically but also as per Wikipedia's notability policy
WP:N, see it is not always necessary to get notability in media when it comes to
India. D Mi™ 18:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.