From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Don't usually close this early but as can be seen here tons of stuff crops up so clearly BEFORE wasn't followed, ( non-admin closure)Davey2010 Talk 20:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Ala Hazrat Express

Ala Hazrat Express (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, no sources given that discuss this. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 08:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Keep Just see , how many news sources are coming up. ScholarM ( talk) 08:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep There is nothing called "notable train" and "non-notable train". This train do exists and travels nearly half of India, covers distance more than 1500km. Thats enough. Even Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations) doesn't talks anything about trains. -- Human3015 TALK  01:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Most of the article should be deleted per WP:NTT and the coverage that I found on google news did not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The coverage was just incidental and talked most about delays and cancellations. So said The Great Wiki Lord. ( talk) 21:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - The article is pretty notable not just philosophically but also as per Wikipedia's notability policy WP:N, see it is not always necessary to get notability in media when it comes to India.  D Mi 18:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Don't usually close this early but as can be seen here tons of stuff crops up so clearly BEFORE wasn't followed, ( non-admin closure)Davey2010 Talk 20:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Ala Hazrat Express

Ala Hazrat Express (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, no sources given that discuss this. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 08:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Keep Just see , how many news sources are coming up. ScholarM ( talk) 08:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep There is nothing called "notable train" and "non-notable train". This train do exists and travels nearly half of India, covers distance more than 1500km. Thats enough. Even Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations) doesn't talks anything about trains. -- Human3015 TALK  01:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Most of the article should be deleted per WP:NTT and the coverage that I found on google news did not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The coverage was just incidental and talked most about delays and cancellations. So said The Great Wiki Lord. ( talk) 21:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - The article is pretty notable not just philosophically but also as per Wikipedia's notability policy WP:N, see it is not always necessary to get notability in media when it comes to India.  D Mi 18:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook