From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Al-Wahs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One sentence, basic infobox, only 3 sources all Non-RS(Previously De-PRODed) PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 23:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep The reason to delete is unclear - short articles are acceptable and the sources are not obviously unreliable. It's also more useful when looking for information about a place to have just the information about the place in one article than have to search through a longer page (particularly where a different spelling or transliteration may be used). The district page would become too long if it had to include all subdistricts and villages. Peter James ( talk) 08:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I second Peter James' reasons, and would add that randomly deleting places in a war zone could be perceived as POV. There are 3000 people...maybe you can find better sources. 142.126.146.27 ( talk) 17:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I agree that there is nothing wrong with stub articles as long as they are reliably sourced.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC) reply

none of the three sources are reliable sources PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 19:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Al-Wahs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One sentence, basic infobox, only 3 sources all Non-RS(Previously De-PRODed) PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 23:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep The reason to delete is unclear - short articles are acceptable and the sources are not obviously unreliable. It's also more useful when looking for information about a place to have just the information about the place in one article than have to search through a longer page (particularly where a different spelling or transliteration may be used). The district page would become too long if it had to include all subdistricts and villages. Peter James ( talk) 08:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I second Peter James' reasons, and would add that randomly deleting places in a war zone could be perceived as POV. There are 3000 people...maybe you can find better sources. 142.126.146.27 ( talk) 17:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I agree that there is nothing wrong with stub articles as long as they are reliably sourced.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC) reply

none of the three sources are reliable sources PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 19:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook