From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Aishe Ghosh

Aishe Ghosh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NPOL, being a candidate does not confer notability. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Being the president of the students union of a university is not an automatic pass of WP:POL. The coverage shows that the notability of the subject is related to the WP:SINGLEEVENT of the 2020 Jawaharlal Nehru University attack. Besides that, I also see COI issues to this page as the article was created by an editor who claimed this image as their work on the commons, and I can not find the image online (which would imply copyright infringement). This implies a close connection between the uploader and the subject.— TheWikiholic ( talk) 13:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
There might be COI issues but that doesn't deny the fact that the subject passes GNG. Beccaynr has presented a number of sources below. "When GNG passes, we don't need to look at any other subjective guideline." ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The article creator also appears to be a new editor, but per the sources identified by TheAafi above and myself below, editing can improve the article, and therefore would be preferable to deletion, per WP:ATD. Beccaynr ( talk) 14:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Comment Also, to respond to the suggestion that this is WP:SINGLEEVENT, WP:BIO1E appears to clearly not apply, because the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, as demonstrated by the sources identified in this discussion, and there are sources covering Ghosh for more than one event, i.e. her student activism, injury, charges, and her later candidacy. In addition, WP:BLP1E appears to clearly not apply, because reliable sources are not covering Ghosh in the context of a single event, and based on the sources, she has not and is not likely to remain a low-profile individual, and the multiple events she has been involved in were substantial and her role has been well-documented. Beccaynr ( talk) 14:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep an interesting AFD discussion with many of my favorite people participating together. A treat! Agreed with my teacher Celestina007 that it doesn't cross WP:NPOL. One criteria of NPOL talks about massive following locally but the subject doesn't meet that either. I would also oppose the righteous Beccaynr when they say it is a significant event. As much as many would hate me, I think when WP:1E says significant, it means something much larger. An event relating to Student politics (according to me) won't become a part of it. This is of course open to interpretation and will depend on how much we sentimentally relate to what happened. All of this aside, I feel there is sufficient for WP:BASIC. The event has surely helped her launch herself and there is coverage about her beyond that one event. Hence, a keep from me. Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 16:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, easily passes WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.- Danish Daniel 99 ( talk) 12:40, 04 August 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Aishe Ghosh

Aishe Ghosh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician who fails to satisfy any criterion from WP:NPOL, being a candidate does not confer notability. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Being the president of the students union of a university is not an automatic pass of WP:POL. The coverage shows that the notability of the subject is related to the WP:SINGLEEVENT of the 2020 Jawaharlal Nehru University attack. Besides that, I also see COI issues to this page as the article was created by an editor who claimed this image as their work on the commons, and I can not find the image online (which would imply copyright infringement). This implies a close connection between the uploader and the subject.— TheWikiholic ( talk) 13:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
There might be COI issues but that doesn't deny the fact that the subject passes GNG. Beccaynr has presented a number of sources below. "When GNG passes, we don't need to look at any other subjective guideline." ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The article creator also appears to be a new editor, but per the sources identified by TheAafi above and myself below, editing can improve the article, and therefore would be preferable to deletion, per WP:ATD. Beccaynr ( talk) 14:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Comment Also, to respond to the suggestion that this is WP:SINGLEEVENT, WP:BIO1E appears to clearly not apply, because the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, as demonstrated by the sources identified in this discussion, and there are sources covering Ghosh for more than one event, i.e. her student activism, injury, charges, and her later candidacy. In addition, WP:BLP1E appears to clearly not apply, because reliable sources are not covering Ghosh in the context of a single event, and based on the sources, she has not and is not likely to remain a low-profile individual, and the multiple events she has been involved in were substantial and her role has been well-documented. Beccaynr ( talk) 14:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep an interesting AFD discussion with many of my favorite people participating together. A treat! Agreed with my teacher Celestina007 that it doesn't cross WP:NPOL. One criteria of NPOL talks about massive following locally but the subject doesn't meet that either. I would also oppose the righteous Beccaynr when they say it is a significant event. As much as many would hate me, I think when WP:1E says significant, it means something much larger. An event relating to Student politics (according to me) won't become a part of it. This is of course open to interpretation and will depend on how much we sentimentally relate to what happened. All of this aside, I feel there is sufficient for WP:BASIC. The event has surely helped her launch herself and there is coverage about her beyond that one event. Hence, a keep from me. Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 16:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, easily passes WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.- Danish Daniel 99 ( talk) 12:40, 04 August 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook