The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 22:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)reply
A table in fruitless search for an article. The information here is already present on the two aircraft articles, so there's nothing to merge. This is unsourced, unverified information, and basically unencyclopedic. I'm an active member of WP:AIR and this doesn't even come close to fitting any Project standards.
Akradecki 17:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete — Agree with nom. This tabulation likely only has propagandistic value. —
RJH (
talk) 20:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. You probably should have combined your nominations, as they are very similar. —
Disavian (
talk/
contribs) 04:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 22:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)reply
A table in fruitless search for an article. The information here is already present on the two aircraft articles, so there's nothing to merge. This is unsourced, unverified information, and basically unencyclopedic. I'm an active member of WP:AIR and this doesn't even come close to fitting any Project standards.
Akradecki 17:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete — Agree with nom. This tabulation likely only has propagandistic value. —
RJH (
talk) 20:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. You probably should have combined your nominations, as they are very similar. —
Disavian (
talk/
contribs) 04:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.