The result was delete. Few participants, but it's worthwhile noting that the nay-sayers have arguments on their side; the lone yes vote offers only that "references can be improved", without actually doing so. Drmies ( talk) 01:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Fails WP:BIO. reddogsix ( talk) 19:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Few participants, but it's worthwhile noting that the nay-sayers have arguments on their side; the lone yes vote offers only that "references can be improved", without actually doing so. Drmies ( talk) 01:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Fails WP:BIO. reddogsix ( talk) 19:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply